Original main objective of the Project:

The question heard most often: “Why are you here ?” - To give a better life to the land.

There was an opportunity, factual and legal, and an aspiration to protect the place. The land was bought because it was severely destroyed and deserved a better life.

The main objectives are to allow Nature develop according to its own laws, protecting it from human induced-stress, helping it with interventions like large scale reforestation with native trees or similar, by recognising and protecting the intrinsic rights of Nature and its forests, and orienting the management towards their needs and priorities.

Vision: the ecosystem is as close as possible to what it was before the deliberate fires of the 1939, a healthy ecosystem that does not degrade and that can evolve naturally, protected and respected, if possible in perpetuity.

rivers Leones and Claro

01.2018 - April 2020

A case study of the experience of the

Private Protected Nature Area Pichimahuida (the Project),

a site for repair and healing of Nature and

applied ecosystem and wilderness restoration,

located in the valley of river Leones, Aysén (region XI), Chile,

Private Protected Nature Area Pichimahuida

Pichimahuida :

  1. Objective

  2. Location

  3. Access Leones

  4. Collaboration

  5. Friends

The case study:

    Consists of the analysis of the 14 years experience of an ethics and legal, not scientific, Project for nature recuperation ( ≃ ecological restoration, reforestation, protection, rehabilitation), set up in Chilean Patagonia; of an experiment where private property is used to protect the privacy of Nature, supported only by personal funds (with the exception of subsidies for reforestation covering a small portion of the planting and in kind donation), funds saved through long-term work at managerial positions in an international environmental organisation, international environmental conventions, chemicals treaties and a national EPA, and by using that experience; of the extend nature can regenerate after 80 years of large scale and severe degradation by anthropogenic activities, in a region where the ecosystems and wilderness have been consistently ruined, some of them collapsed and presently mainly novel ecosystems have developed; of which features of the ecosystem could be restored, and which are lost forever; to what extent resilience can be rebuilt and of what exactly ecosystem we are rebuilding the resilience; on the other hand no one knows what “resilience” really means and there are virtually no indicators to assess resilience capacity, so the Project is rather building the anti-fragility of a novel ecosystem, making it as independent, adaptable and flexible as possible in the long term, including resilience to societal changes.

    Uses, as well as this site, only personal experiences and conclusions. The experiences, solutions, challenges, achievements, mistakes and opportunities described here are specific to the present Project and case study only, with some minimal extrapolation on the region. Due to the disinterest for this type of projects on the local level, resulting from the reticence to change land use from destructive cattle raising and uncontrolled development of adventure tourism (but the land use is changing anyway in the region), as well as to the international valuation of the project, some pages are not translated into Spanish. Only a frame of the study is presented through this site.

  Has been used as a showcase for acute Nature degradation and severely abuse of Nature’s rights; as well as to shape a Foundation dedicated to protection of the rights of Nature, ensuring long-term legal protection of reforested wild areas, and to design an In Rem Right of Conservation agreement (Chilean law 20.930) with it, so it can take the necessary steps to protect the area, to ensure long-term legal protection of the land of the project and re-created native forest. It has also been used to identify solutions for making ecological restoration and reforestation projects independent, to identifying relevant existing experiences, f.e. nature exclusion zones, and philosophies, f.e. rights of Nature, Biosphere theory or personhood of ecosystems, to develop own approaches, criteria and principles.

    Seeks to apply holistic approach to land conservation and forest protection, summarized as protection of living matter, based on personally identified  best available practices (BAP) for this particular project, regardless of their physical or time location, for the determining facets of the project.

Main attributes of the Project:

land in private property (6 properties of approx. 1800 ha in total, managed as one), all legal provisions relevant to private property apply;

adjacent to the Laguna San Rafael National Park;

severely and irreversibly degraded ecosystem (anthropogenic activities), like most of the region;

a good representation of the future of areas burned in the world in 2019-2020 due to climate change;

in 2006, a long-term management program aimed at the recovery of such ecosystems was established;

the management and administration of the project do not seek to obtain economic gains;

the Project is entirely oriented at the values, priorities and needs of nature, an area where nature’s rights prevail;

key goal: help Nature, wild plants and animals by protecting their territory for them;

a reforestation project with native trees under current national legislation;

a test ground for ecological restoration techniques;

a test ground for nature-friendly logistics in remote areas;

sanctuary for wildlife of any type;

a quiet zone for wildlife and wildlife friendly orchards, mitigating the global biodiversity crisis;

carbon sink as an abandoned agricultural land;

research for reliable long-term methods of legal protection of such projects;

uses the experience of the Swiss National Park;

located in a local institutional and customary environment that accepts nature degrading methods.

Therefore, the Project is not :

≠ not a park ;

≠ not open to any visitors ;

≠ not a conservation project ;

≠ not an attractive area, due to the high level of anthropogenic degradation of the ecosystem.

And the Project does not:

≠ not provide direct access to the San Rafael national park or / and to the Northern Patagonian Ice field;

≠ not develop or allow any type of tourism activities,

    being too degraded;

≠ not have soil suitable for any type of  agriculture - no competition for land use.

Strategies / Steps taken

Main: change of land use away from agriculture to nature protection, and

Protection from immediate stresses: removal of cattle, protecting sensitive areas, stabilising eroding areas, channelling tourists

Assisting natural regeneration

Aforestation with native trees

Wetland restoration

Developing supporting infrastructure

Erosion control, desertification prevention

De-farming, protection from cattle

Give autonomy to Nature, rewilding

Internships and volunteers programmes

Commitment to long-term management

Working with change, avoiding conservation

Information exchange, highlighting damage to regional ecosystems

Legal arrangements for future land protection

Promoting the right to responsibility for land and

    living matter

Adapting solutions to nature, not nature to solutions

Promoting restoration of nature for its own sake,

   not rebuilding natural resources

Trying to keep the momentum of ecosystems in

    negative feedback.

The main aspiration remains to protect the area


Anthropogenic threats: recently (last 80 years) imported colonial land and cattle management practices, uncontrolled tourism (any type), intrusive investigations (scientific and other), any type of publicity, pollution, acceleration of changes;

Natural threats: fire, climate change (via help to ecosystem’s move).


Preserving the potential of the evolution of living Nature;

Continuously strengthening resilience of a forest ecological community;

Responding to needs of global issues, such as climate change;

Giving time to Nature to heal itself;

Special protection of sensitive areas;

Observations and experiences (observation vs. investigation) for solutions which prioritize nature;

Long term survival of the project;

Demonstration of success of private non-institutional approach.

Усадьба Pichimahuida

Management principle:

Protection of the privacy of Nature as the main stakeholder, crucial for the effectiveness and success of the project.

And the best protection method being the

elaboration of an adequate theory and principles to be used for as long as possible.

Successes / achievements:

‣ Successful reforestation programme: Largest project under law 20.283 in the area, with survival rate of approx. 85 % to date

‣ Rebound of the ecosystem (novel)

‣ Erosion control

‣ Infrastructure based on renewables

‣ Patchwork of carbon capture opportunities

‣ Return of endangered (huemul, puma, bats) and migratory bird species

‣ Wetlands revival

‣ Compensation reserve, resilience pocket

‣ Successful change of land use


We have to admit that we lost the battle for Nature protection.

Time for compromises is over.

The mass extinction of Nature is accelerating.

We can just help it to disappear decently, without suffering.

Corresponding IUCN status - 1a “Strict Nature Reserve” applied to a degraded area.

Wilderness areas reduce extinction by more 1/2